Purpose
Achievement Criteria
Explanatory Note 1
Demonstrate understanding of the use of a range of scientific investigative approaches in a context involves:
- carrying out a range of investigative approaches that each answer a question
- describing the purpose of each investigative approach, supported by evidence.
Explain the use of a range of scientific investigative approaches in a context involves:
- giving an evidence-based reason why each investigative approach was or was not appropriate to answer a question.
Analyse the use of a range of scientific investigative approaches in a context involves:
- using evidence to validate findings with reference to the range of investigative approaches used.
Explanatory Note 2
Examples of a range of scientific investigative approaches include at least three of:
- pattern seeking
- exploring and observing
- modelling
- classifying and identifying
- fair testing.
Explanatory Note 3
Examples of evidence include:
- experimental data
- observational data
- statistics
- surveys
- consultation with a wider body of knowledge, or discussion such as wānanga.
Explanatory Note 4
Validate means to use evidence to check or prove how appropriate, or not, the data or findings are when used to respond to the question or context investigated.
Shared Explanatory Note
Refer to the NCEA glossary for Māori, Pacific, and further subject-specific terms and concepts.
This achievement standard is derived from the Science Learning Area at Level 6 of The New Zealand Curriculum: Learning Media, Ministry of Education, 2007.
Conditions of Assessment
Assessor involvement during the assessment event is limited to:
- providing general feedback. They can suggest sections of student work that would benefit from further development, or skills a student may need to revisit across the work. Student work that has received sustained or detailed feedback is not suitable for submission towards this Standard.
- giving direction by providing a purpose and skeletal method for the investigations and context.
- helping students develop good practice that is not a requirement of the assessment such as referencing and attribution of third-party content, and presentation of work. Students should not be limited to a method or decision about presentation — this decision can be made in consultation with the assessor.
At the start of the assessment event, assessors need to provide students with commonly used resources, tools, or equipment to support development of the student evidence.
Assessment activities that involve a practical component must follow relevant safety protocols, as described in Safety and Science/Pūtaiao Guidance for Aotearoa New Zealand Schools and Kura.
Students must be actively involved in any group component to this assessment and will need to identify their contribution.
During the investigations students may wānanga, talanoa, consult with others, discuss with classmates, or consult a wider body of knowledge as they collect overarching findings.
Evidence for all parts of this assessment can be in te reo Māori, English, or New Zealand Sign Language.
Unpacking the Standard
Mātauranga Māori constitutes concepts and principles that are richly detailed, complex, and fundamental to Māoridom. It is important to remember that the practice of these are wider and more varied than their use within the proposed NCEA Achievement Standards and supporting documentation.
We also recognise that the cultures, languages, and identities of the Pacific Islands are diverse, varied, and unique. Therefore the Pacific concepts, contexts, and principles that have been incorporated within NCEA Achievement Standards may have wide-ranging understandings and applications across and within the diversity of Pacific communities. It is not our intention to define what these concepts mean but rather offer some ways that they could be understood and applied within different subjects that kaiako and students alike can explore.
Mātauranga Māori constitutes concepts and principles that are richly detailed, complex, and fundamental to Māoridom. It is important to remember that the practice of these are wider and more varied than their use within the proposed NCEA Achievement Standards and supporting documentation.
We also recognise that the cultures, languages, and identities of the Pacific Islands are diverse, varied, and unique. Therefore the Pacific concepts, contexts, and principles that have been incorporated within NCEA Achievement Standards may have wide-ranging understandings and applications across and within the diversity of Pacific communities. It is not our intention to define what these concepts mean but rather offer some ways that they could be understood and applied within different subjects that kaiako and students alike can explore.
The intent of the Standard
Different investigative approaches have different functions and purposes. When a scientist is carrying out an investigation, they must choose which approach to use to best answer their questions. Through the teaching and learning of science, ākonga will learn to think critically about information, data, and the claims that they encounter in daily life.
The purpose of this Achievement Standard is for ākonga to show their understanding of different investigative approaches within the same context. Different approaches will lead to different types of data and findings. Ākonga will need to think about the question they are trying to answer, the type of data that they need, and the type of investigation to use. Once they have collected their data, they will need to analyse it to find out what it means. This leads to a finding from the investigation, which could be a conclusion, or something that has been learnt from the results. They will use these findings to reflect on how well the question was addressed by the investigative approach. Ākonga may look at research, or the investigations of others, to determine how valid their own results were in context.
This Standard aligns with the following items of Significant Learning:
- engage with the iterative process of science investigation through innovation, problem solving, inquiry, collaboration, and evaluation
- recognise how different approaches can be used in science investigations
- recognise that scientific ideas are developed through critical and creative thinking, regulated by evidence
- recognise that science ideas are communicated using a range of methods with discipline-specific practices.
Making reliable judgments
Kaiako will support and guide ākonga in developing appropriate research questions and investigative methods. Kaiako may provide a skeletal method to get ākonga started.
Ākonga will be able to describe the purpose of three different investigative approaches used in the same context and understand the relationship between the type of investigation used, and the findings it produced. At higher levels of achievement, ākonga will be able to validate their findings within the context using evidence.
Ākonga should work in groups to carry out their investigations and collect their evidence. Results should be recorded and processed using appropriate scientific conventions. Ākonga will demonstrate their understanding through individual responses to the investigations. These could be in the form of a presentation or report.
Collecting evidence
In this Standard ākonga will carry out investigations within one identified context, using three different approaches. Each investigative approach will explore a specific question that relates to the same context.
Ākonga will gather data in each investigation — this evidence may be quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative data can be measurements, tallies, statistics, keys, or sample surveys. Qualitative data can be photos, annotated drawings, observations, or interviews.
During their investigations ākonga may wānanga, consult with others, discuss with classmates, or consult a wider body of knowledge as they collect overarching findings that relate to their learning.
Ākonga will reflect individually when validating their findings.
Possible contexts
Ākonga will show an understanding of how to conduct three different types of investigations within a single context. They will understand which investigations are appropriate for which purposes. They will collect, record, and analyse data, report on findings, and compare the different approaches used. Investigative approaches may include:
- pattern seeking
- exploring and observing
- modelling
- classifying and identifying
- fair testing.
The identified context could be an aspect of local environment or a topic of interest to ākonga.
As part of the assessment for this Achievement Standard, an investigation may need to use a model to collect observations or data. Ākonga may change factors to test the effect of different variables and generate results. For example, ākonga may use computer programs or models to explore the effect of introducing a new gene into a population for a certain length of time.
Use of databases forms the foundation of many investigations. Ākonga can use either primary or secondary data to develop their findings.
To achieve this Achievement Standard, ākonga must understand how scientific findings can be verified. Wānanga can contribute to the process ākonga use to verify their findings.
The emphasis is on understanding the purpose of different investigative approaches, rather than analysing the accuracy of a method. Ākonga will understand that different investigations involve several of the same features, but the type of investigation will determine the type of data produced.
The intent of the Standard
Different investigative approaches have different functions and purposes. When a scientist is carrying out an investigation, they must choose which approach to use to best answer their questions. Through the teaching and learning of science, ākonga will learn to think critically about information, data, and the claims that they encounter in daily life.
The purpose of this Achievement Standard is for ākonga to show their understanding of different investigative approaches within the same context. Different approaches will lead to different types of data and findings. Ākonga will need to think about the question they are trying to answer, the type of data that they need, and the type of investigation to use. Once they have collected their data, they will need to analyse it to find out what it means. This leads to a finding from the investigation, which could be a conclusion, or something that has been learnt from the results. They will use these findings to reflect on how well the question was addressed by the investigative approach. Ākonga may look at research, or the investigations of others, to determine how valid their own results were in context.
This Standard aligns with the following items of Significant Learning:
- engage with the iterative process of science investigation through innovation, problem solving, inquiry, collaboration, and evaluation
- recognise how different approaches can be used in science investigations
- recognise that scientific ideas are developed through critical and creative thinking, regulated by evidence
- recognise that science ideas are communicated using a range of methods with discipline-specific practices.
Making reliable judgments
Kaiako will support and guide ākonga in developing appropriate research questions and investigative methods. Kaiako may provide a skeletal method to get ākonga started.
Ākonga will be able to describe the purpose of three different investigative approaches used in the same context and understand the relationship between the type of investigation used, and the findings it produced. At higher levels of achievement, ākonga will be able to validate their findings within the context using evidence.
Ākonga should work in groups to carry out their investigations and collect their evidence. Results should be recorded and processed using appropriate scientific conventions. Ākonga will demonstrate their understanding through individual responses to the investigations. These could be in the form of a presentation or report.
Collecting evidence
In this Standard ākonga will carry out investigations within one identified context, using three different approaches. Each investigative approach will explore a specific question that relates to the same context.
Ākonga will gather data in each investigation — this evidence may be quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative data can be measurements, tallies, statistics, keys, or sample surveys. Qualitative data can be photos, annotated drawings, observations, or interviews.
During their investigations ākonga may wānanga, consult with others, discuss with classmates, or consult a wider body of knowledge as they collect overarching findings that relate to their learning.
Ākonga will reflect individually when validating their findings.
Possible contexts
Ākonga will show an understanding of how to conduct three different types of investigations within a single context. They will understand which investigations are appropriate for which purposes. They will collect, record, and analyse data, report on findings, and compare the different approaches used. Investigative approaches may include:
- pattern seeking
- exploring and observing
- modelling
- classifying and identifying
- fair testing.
The identified context could be an aspect of local environment or a topic of interest to ākonga.
As part of the assessment for this Achievement Standard, an investigation may need to use a model to collect observations or data. Ākonga may change factors to test the effect of different variables and generate results. For example, ākonga may use computer programs or models to explore the effect of introducing a new gene into a population for a certain length of time.
Use of databases forms the foundation of many investigations. Ākonga can use either primary or secondary data to develop their findings.
To achieve this Achievement Standard, ākonga must understand how scientific findings can be verified. Wānanga can contribute to the process ākonga use to verify their findings.
The emphasis is on understanding the purpose of different investigative approaches, rather than analysing the accuracy of a method. Ākonga will understand that different investigations involve several of the same features, but the type of investigation will determine the type of data produced.
Standard Exclusions
This Standard has one or more exclusions, or Standards that assess the same or similar learning. These Standards are excluded against one another to prevent assessing the same learning twice. You can only use credits gained from one of these standards towards your NCEA qualification.
Find out more about the NCEA Level 1 Exclusions List.
Standard Exclusions
This Standard has one or more exclusions, or Standards that assess the same or similar learning. These Standards are excluded against one another to prevent assessing the same learning twice. You can only use credits gained from one of these standards towards your NCEA qualification.
Find out more about the NCEA Level 1 Exclusions List.
Literacy and Numeracy Requirements
This Achievement Standard has been approved for literacy. It can be used for the 2023 NCEA Level 1 Pilot to meet the NCEA co-requisite requirements.
Full information on the co-requisite for 2024 and 2025: Standards approved for NCEA co-requisite for 2024 and 2025.
Literacy and Numeracy Requirements
This Achievement Standard has been approved for literacy. It can be used for the 2023 NCEA Level 1 Pilot to meet the NCEA co-requisite requirements.
Full information on the co-requisite for 2024 and 2025: Standards approved for NCEA co-requisite for 2024 and 2025.