^{Te Reo Māori translation to come}

This section provides guidelines for assessment against internally assessed Standards. Guidance is provided on:

• appropriate ways of, and conditions for, gathering evidence
• ensuring that evidence is authentic
• any other relevant advice specific to an Achievement Standard.

NB: Information on additional generic guidance on assessment practice in schools is published on the NZQA website. It would be useful to read in conjunction with these Conditions of Assessment.

The school's Assessment Policy and Conditions of Assessment must be consistent with the Assessment Rules for Schools With Consent to Assess. These rules will be updated during the NCEA review. This link includes guidance for managing internal moderation and the collection of evidence.

For all Achievement Standards

Internal assessment provides considerable flexibility in the collection of evidence. Evidence can be collected in different ways to suit a range of teaching and learning styles, and a range of contexts. Care needs to be taken to offer students opportunities to present their best evidence against the Standard(s) that are free from unnecessary constraints.

It is recommended that the design of assessment reflects and reinforces the ways students have been learning. Collection of evidence for the internally assessed Standards could include, but is not restricted to, an extended task, an investigation, digital evidence (such as recorded interviews, blogs, photographs or film), or a portfolio of evidence.

It is also recommended that the collection of evidence for internally assessed Standards should not use the same method that is used for any external Standards in a course, particularly if that method is using a time-bound written examination. This could unfairly disadvantage students who do not perform well under these conditions.

A separate assessment event is not needed for each Standard. Often assessment can be integrated into one activity that collects evidence towards two or three different Standards from a programme of learning. Evidence can also be collected over time from a range of linked activities (for example, in a portfolio).This approach can also ease the assessment workload for both students and teachers.

Effective assessment should suit the nature of the learning being assessed, provide opportunities to meet the diverse needs of all students, and be valid and fair.

Authenticity of student evidence needs to be assured regardless of the method of collecting evidence. This needs to be in line with school policy. For example: an investigation carried out over several sessions could include teacher observations or the use of milestones such as a meeting with the student, a journal, or photographic entries recording progress etc.

Tātari Kounga

Me matua whakamana ngā Kaituku Akoranga me ngā Whakahaere Whakangungu Ahumahi e te Mana Tohu Mātauranga o Aotearoa, ka rēhita ai ngā hua ka puta mai i ngā aromatawaitanga ki ngā paerewa paetae.

Ko ngā Kaituku Akoranga me ngā Whakahaere Whakangungu Ahumahi kua mana, ā, e aromatawai ana ā rātou hōtaka ki ngā paerewa paetae, me uru rātou ki ngā pūnaha whakarite e tika ana mō aua paerewa paetae.

Ko te tohutoro ki te Mahere Whakatutuki i te Whakamanatanga me te Whakaōritenga.